this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
576 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I think the same could be said about the affordability and housing crisis, or the climate crisis, or preparedness for a potential bird flu pandemic...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Sure, and I agree. Your point?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'd rather increase funds for the things I suggested, whereas it sounds like you see increased defence spending as a greater priority. We can agree to disagree

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't think we actually disagree with much - I certainly agree with the priorities you listed.

However, I also think that defense is also a priority - one that is becoming increasingly urgent with the general state of the world and the unreliability of our closest ally, and that has been neglected for decades.

And I'm not sure I buy in to the idea that we have to choose amongst those priorities. That kind of rhetoric is used to justify all kinds of cuts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don’t think we actually disagree with much

You may be right. I see the things I highlighted as directly and predictably improving the lives of the working class (and hopefully their civic engagement by extension), whereas defence spending directly and predictably improves the earnings of arms manufacturers and the fossil fuel industry and may improve the lives of the working classes. With an objectively false headline like CBC ran, I feel a need to counter some palpable bias

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair enough - I do think the article makes it clear who the "everyone" is in this case - provincial and federal leadership - but I totally get why you'd bristle at it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Bristle is a great word :)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)