this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
27 points (90.9% liked)

NFL

4405 readers
42 users here now

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  5. No trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

NFL - [email protected]
NFL Memes [email protected]
Arizona Cardinals [email protected]
Chicago Bears [email protected]
Cincinnati Bengals [email protected]
Cleveland Browns [email protected]
Dallas Cowboys [email protected]
Denver Broncos [email protected]
Detroit Lions [email protected]
Green Bay Packers [email protected]
Houston Texans [email protected]
Indianapolis Colts [email protected]
Kansas City Chiefs [email protected]
Jacksonville Jaguars [email protected]
Los Angeles Chargers [email protected]
Los Angeles Rams [email protected]
Miami Dolphins [email protected]
Minnesota Vikings [email protected]
New England Patriots [email protected]
New York Giants [email protected]
New York Jets [email protected]
Philadelphia Eagles [email protected] - [email protected]
Pittsburgh Steelers [email protected]
San Francisco 49ers [email protected]
Seattle Seahawks [email protected]
Washington Commanders [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jarix 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I guess my eyesight isn't good enough from the video posted and i can't pause it to see frame by frame like in would like. It doesn't appear to me that contact was made on head neck, it looks like it's made right above the number 16. Fair enough to call it dirty if its more obvious than it is to me that he aimed for the helmet.

I'll state again though that a hit doesn't need to be dirty for it to be bad.

Edit: Variety of angles

First point of contact is the shoulder forearm to the head definitely happened following contact, but contact was going to be made, not sure how it wouldn't have happened in some form.

Looks a lot worse in some of these new angles and with slow motion. Still think the retaliation was worse. Don't care how much you are upset retaliation is not a free pass to be also bad

[–] baldingpudenda 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm agreeing with you in all counts. It's football, even good hits get people hurt. I also don't think the defender was trying to hurt the QB in that play. It's just how it ended up and the league is definitely trying to make it safer and cracking down.

The retaliation, to me, should have been an ejection as well. Play was stopped and he was defenseless. Those shots to the back can seriously hurt or end careers. Could have giving him whiplash.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

It may make you happy to learn that the player that retaliated WAS ejected, as well as another Jags player who shoved him.

https://youtu.be/xSAL17ByqII?si=Z-9soDWE6_AD09-6

IMO it isn't all about whether you have an explicit intent to hurt someone, rather it's about using the wrong technique in a situation where you know that someone could get hurt. The defender gets paid a LOT of money to be one of the best at this sport, so there is a reasonable expectation that they will make every attempt to preserve their coworkers' safety.