United Kingdom

4138 readers

75 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

MPs vote in favour of historic bill to allow assisted dying after emotional debate (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some progress, finally.

Edit: for the benefit of the tinfoil hat wearers, assisted dying is not the same as euthanasia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What evidence do you have that the law will become so lax that doctors will aggressively push people to being euthanised?

Canada

[–] TheGrandNagus 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Because "they just will mate. Slippery slope innit." isn't one IMO.

You're just back at the "it's a slippery slope" argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Canada literally did it

[–] TheGrandNagus 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Canada literally isn't the UK.

The motion that was passed is nothing like the framework Canada has.

Plenty of countries ban drinking alcohol. You may as well be saying that having restrictions on alcohol for under 18s means it's a slippery slope and it'll be banned here. After all, Saudi Arabia literally did it. America literally did it. Qatar literally did it. Etc.

Like I said, I want evidence. Not slippery slope fallacy. Show me MPs saying they intend to implement the system Canada has.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Moving the goalposts