this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
555 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

60039 readers
4613 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Writing a 100-word email using ChatGPT (GPT-4, latest model) consumes 1 x 500ml bottle of water It uses 140Wh of energy, enough for 7 full charges of an iPhone Pro Max

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pyre 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

i think you're not thinking about what efficiency means for corporations.

[–] 13esq 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think it's exactly what I'm thinking about, unless I'm missing something specific that you'd like to put forward?

If I own a bottled drinks company and the energy cost is 10p a bottle but a new, more efficient process is invented that would lower my energy cost to 5p a bottle, that's going to be looking like a wise investment to make. A few pence over several thousand products adds up pretty quickly.

I could either pocket the difference as extra profit, lower my unit price to the consumer to make my product more competitive in the market, or a bit of both.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems basic logic like this doesn't actually work on these people. Most really can't get their heads around the fact that energy costs money and companies want to use less of it wherever possible and practical to do so.

[–] 13esq 2 points 3 weeks ago

The mob is fickle, brother.

The hive mind has concluded AI=bad and any comment that doesn't go along with the consensus is going to get downvotes.

It's really not that different from the beginning of the industrial revolution, when cotton mills first started to implement the spinning jenny, leaving many workers out of a job who'd go in to the factories at night to smash the machines up.

No one wants to go back to spinning cotton all day now though and it will be the same with jobs taken by AI.