this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
100 points (92.4% liked)

Programming

17313 readers
556 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I hope that someday they decide to add the diacritic to clear up the confusion (Forĝejo (/forˈd͡ʒe.jo/) is how it's supposed to be pronounced). It's 2024, there's no reason we should be afraid of non-ASCII characters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It’s 2024, there’s no reason we should be afraid of non-ASCII characters.

I use an American layout and don't have a numpad :(

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

On screen keyboards exist for you monsters who think ditching the numpad is acceptable behaviour

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How does one actually read these? Wouldn't phonetic spelling be infinitely more digestible?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/English

This is phonetic^1^ spelling. The only good one.

^1^ Actually phonemic. Don’t kill me

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't see a reason to spell it phonetically when it is a real word (forge in esperanto). A phonetic spelling would also only be more digestible to readers who know the language the phonetic spelling is tailored at (phonetic spelling is language specific as different languages use different ways to represent different sounds).

ĝ is simply the english sound of the consonants in the following words: "john", "gem", "jar". And j is pronounced as the y in "yes" and "yoink"

The diacritic would clear up confusion, because "g" without the diacritic has different sound (like the g in "gamma", "girl", "go" in english). The diacritic as a bonus would also makes it clear that it isn't supposed to be pronounced it as if it were in english, because english does not use the ^ diacritic. It would also extinguish my annoyance at seeing a misspelled word being used as a trademark.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

A phonetic spelling would also only be more digestible to readers who know the language the phonetic spelling is tailored at

Indeed, it would be digestible to 1.5 billion people instead of 100k.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no universal "phonetic spelling."

Every language and its user have unique accent and they will intreprete phonitic spelling differently.

[–] olafurp 12 points 21 hours ago

There is one, it's called the IPA or International Phonetic Alphabet and is used mostly by linguist. The IPA spelling changes based on dialects within the same language and if you know all the letters and are able to pronounce them you could in theory read a text written in IPA and the listener could understand it.