this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
57 points (80.6% liked)

Europe

1559 readers
1384 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Diring the press conference yesterday the government speaker Hebestreit said that an "examination" is necessary as the jurisdiction of the ICC would be "not uncontested" despite this having been discussed and ruled by the court in 2021. When asked what Germany did in those three years he said they havent declared to recognise that ruling hence now they have to examine...

Here is the conference to watch. The arrest warrants come up at around minute 4

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NRl3X5nN4R4

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

When asked what Germany did in those three years he said they havent declared to recognise that ruling hence now they have to examine…

Yes. They have to examine exactly how that intersects with German law and what procedure will have to be adhered to.

If you watched that conference you might've noticed that they were very clear about Germany sticking to the ICC statutes and the rule of law, while completely avoiding talking about that might mean in concrete terms regarding Netanyahu. That means "Yes we'd arrest him if he's stupid enough to come here which is the reason he won't also please stop asking we don't want any more of a diplomatic headache on a tightrope".

What about "Germany considers ICC rulings binding" did you not understand. They said it loud and clear. Contrast that to, say, the US, where Biden is on record saying that the ICC lost its marbles (or something to that effect).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That is not what they said. They have questioned the jurisdiction of the ICC, explivtly saying that they didnt make any comment towards acknowledging it since the ruling in 2021.

There is also no procedural problem that would have to be solved. If he is on German soil police arrests him and he gets extradited to the Netherlands. There is well established procedures in regards to international arrest warrents for normal criminals. It is a farce.

Saying they are among the greatest supporter of the court doesnt mean shit, if they cannot directly say that they will uphold a specific ruling.

And the specific ruling is extraordinarily clear. If Netanyahu, Gallant or Deif (if he is still alive) are within German jurisdictiom they have to be arrested and handed over to the ICC.

There is no hypotheticals or ambiguity. Saying there is any and denying to explicitly state upholding this ruling by executing the warrants is denial of it.

And it is a very strong oppositiom to the court, contrary to what the spokespeople claim.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

They have questioned the jurisdiction of the ICC, explivtly saying that they didnt make any comment towards acknowledging it since the ruling in 2021

Yes because to comment on it they would first have to examine it. Which they didn't do yet because if they did then the journalists would've asked about the results and waffling would have become harder.

Saying they are among the greatest supporter of the court doesnt mean shit, if they cannot directly say that they will uphold a specific ruling.

That's not how Germany works. Germany ratified the ICC treaty, and the government is bound by law. There's no legal wiggle room, it is literally not up to the government whether Netanyahu gets arrested should he set foot on German soil, it's a decision of the courts, which will follow the law.

The government spokespeople made it abundantly, repeatedly, clear, that Germany sticks to the ICC treaty and the rule of law. The rest they don't want to talk about because it's a) hypothetical, Netanyahu won't visit Germany and b) a diplomatic headache.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It is not a matter of a German court to do the arrest. It is a matter of the Police, which is part of the executive branch and hence under the government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

First off, most police in Germany isn't federal. Secondly, guess who decides on matters of arrest and extradition. It isn't the police, or executive in general.

I mean they can play games with e.g. the federal prosecutor (a political civil servant) not wanting to prosecute which will then invariably lead to someone opening a case against him for obstruction of punishment (being a political appointee doesn't mean you don't need to follow law) which if nothing else will lead to a court deciding on the merits of Netanyahu's arrest but that's all a clown show. It won't happen because the foreign service will tell the Israelis, in no unclear terms, that Netanyahu is well-advised to not step foot on German soil.

You seriously think Bibi would gamble getting extradited to the ICC over a political play? For what fucking ends. Even if what you allege is true and the government would do everything in its power to prevent that, for which it really has no reason (nor political backing from the people) the ambiguity of the situation will keep him from risking it.