this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)

Ask Science

8681 readers
6 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the same vein, what about a stellar-sized black hole like Cygnus X-1? At this size the rate of evaporation is quicker, right?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A tablespoon is a measure of volume, not mass

[–] cynar 4 points 1 day ago

It works well enough here. It's bigger than a microgram, and smaller than a kilogram. With the numbers we are working with, being within several orders of magnitude would be an impressive answer.

[–] sir_pronoun 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it's fine to say a tablespoon in this case. You use tablespoon when you're not being exact, it just means "a small amount". Science communication needs to know when to be literal and exact (as in when you design safety measures for radiation, e.g.) and when you can just talk like a normal human being that doesn't have a stick up their degree.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

It's kind of interesting to note that you can't have "a tablespoon of blackhole", since they don't have a volume. But you shouldn't let that stop you from answering the question.

[–] niktemadur 8 points 2 days ago

Ack, ya got me! My mistake.
One tablespoon of sugar is NOT equal to one tablespoon of neutron degenerate matter, that's for freaking certain.
I was thinking more along the lines of something like sugar.