this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)
Ranked Choice Voting
137 readers
3 users here now
Welcome to the Ranked Choice Voting Community!
Voting is broken! Let's fix it.
Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) is a voting system in which voters rank candidates by preference on their ballots. If a candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, they are declared the winner. If no candidate wins a majority, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and votes for that candidate are redistributed to the remaining candidates, based on the next preference on each ballot. This process continues until one candidate has a majority. Learn more about how it works.
Why Ranked Choice Voting?
- Prevents the tyranny of the middle
- Encourages diversity of candidates
- Discourages negative campaigning
- Provides more choice for voters
- Saves money by avoiding runoff elections
Community Rules
- Respect each other's opinions.
- No misinformation. All claims must be backed by credible sources.
- Be proactive and informative.
Sister Communities
- FairVote Canada
- Make one for your country!
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why is it so close?
The people who vote against ranked choice are either too stupid to learn what it is and how it would objectively be better for democracy, people who are smart enough to know how it works and don't support it because it will be bad for their political party, or people who were told what to vote for by an authority figure
I've also seen people who speak out very strongly against IRV on the grounds that they prefer other electoral systems like STAR or approval voting. IMO those are just worse systems than IRV, but I also think that if you do prefer them but campaign against IRV because of a vain hope to arrive at something you consider better in the future, you're letting the perfect be the enemy of the good and undermining genuine democratic change.
"People are stupid" is rarely the best explanation. I'm just surprised that it was so close to 50%. Voting reform isn't usually such a wedge issue.