this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
455 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39347 readers
3489 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australian senators censured Senator Lidia Thorpe for her outburst against King Charles III during his visit, calling him a colonizer and demanding land and reparations. Thorpe defended her actions, stating she would repeat them if Charles returned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. There's still a majority for it, though. Why isn't she shouting at the prime minister "you're not my government" is what I'm saying.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know she can't vote for a king, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And the king has no political influence. The gripe of the Aborigines is with the people actually running the country, with (portions of) the prevailing sentiment in the rest of the population, not the king. The king is just a symbol, a mascot, a piece of ceremony, this is like blaming Bugs Bunny that your movie script got refused.

The king didn't make the Voice referendum fail. That was, best I can tell, a mixture of Chinese bot farms and "yep we should do something but this is not it". There's of course also racists around but they would've been drowned out by the rest of the electorate where it not for those factors.

I don't think reconciliation failed, I don't think even the Voice idea failed, but it needs more workshopping, say, having a wider set of established advisory bodies (just spitballing). Over here there's a minority party which is exempt from the electoral threshold, that's another idea. Whether Australia is a monarchy or republic has quite literally nothing to do with that, it's an orthogonal issue.

...and how come I'm the fucking only one in this thread actually talking about aboriginal rights? Why's everyone so fucking focussed on the monarchy thing, at the expense of those issues?

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 1 month ago

I don't know. How come you're one of the fucking only ones who doesn't understand colonial symbolism?