this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
375 points (90.8% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

1018 readers
408 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The Buddha is not a god. Buddhism is nontheistic and shouldn't be included in this meme.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trust me, for many Buddhists in Asia he plays the same role.

Source: Grew up as one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I grew up Buddhist and I feel like people might think Buddhas are gods but they're more like role models. I hope Buddhists see that.

[–] andros_rex 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The picture is not of the Buddha. That’s a picture of Budai, who was a Buddhist monk and has a variety of religious traditions and worship associated with him. Fat Buddha =|= the Buddha.

Some varieties of Buddhism are nontheistic, but not all varieties. There’s the “little wheel” versus the “big wheel.” Some varieties of Buddhism have hundreds of gods.

Edit:

I do see someone that looks like “the Buddha” in the background - that is, Siddhartha Gautama.

But the idea that Buddhism is some rational atheist philosophy is very much a western gloss. Friend did a study abroad in Myanmar - the Buddha is so revered that having tattoos/casual iconography is sacrilegious and dangerous. A very popular form of Buddhism is “Pure Land” Buddhism, where the goal is to not necessarily reach nirvana, but to be good enough to get to chill in a nice place with the gods in your next life. Buddhist traditions tend to recognize their gods as trapped in samsara just as much as we are, but again, lay practice is going to treat various Buddhas as Demi-gods.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fat Buddha =|= the Buddha.

And icon to contemplate is very different than a god to worship.

[–] andros_rex 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Budai/Hotai is worshipped though. He’s not treated as an “icon to contemplate” - in some traditions he’s even considered a messianic figure (the Maitreya Buddha) himself. That’s why there are statues and shrines.

You are reading a lot of western understandings of religion into practices that are not western. The Alan Watts style of Buddhism is not the style of Buddhism that is practiced by the majority of Buddhists.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He’s not treated as an “icon to contemplate”

Okay buddy

[–] andros_rex 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Have you read a sutra? Can you distinguish Chan Buddhism from Zen Buddhism? Can you identify any of the Buddhist hells?

I’d recommend some of my books from grad school, but this video is a good short overview of the topic.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My guy, you're only digging yourself deeper

[–] andros_rex 1 points 2 months ago

Bro, I literally have taken a graduate religious historiography class and I’m citing sources - if you want, later tonight I can give you a ton of more academic sources. Arguing that Buddhism is nontheistic indicates a serious lack of understanding of Buddhism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Pointing out a basic fact is not pedantry. I am definitely pedantic, but this isn't an example of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You might want to look up the definition of pedantic. Pointing out and drawing attention to the fact that Buddha isn't a god figure for some Buddhists, while technically correct, has nothing to do with the point this post is trying to make. Furthermore, even though Buddha might not be seen as a literal god, his teachings are still the basis for the religion. So his likeness is still an appropriate addition to the image posted.

Your basic fact is useless information and it's by definition pedantic. Seriously, just look up the definition. I don't know if I've ever used it more appropriately.