this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
1156 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

11399 readers
497 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1156
But yes. (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
123 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] chaogomu 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except, even then, an average coal plant will release more radioactive material over its lifetime than Fukushima did.

It's just Chernobyl that you have to top. And even then there are coal plants that come close.

Now, it's not apples to apples. Coal plants release uranium and thorium. Not ceasium and strontium.

But yeah, never go swimming in a coal plant ash pit. For more than the obvious reasons.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

How many average coal plants per Chernobyl though. I suspect that number is surprising lower than the total number of coal plants.