this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
270 points (91.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3334 readers
939 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrokenGlepnir 17 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Depending on what they mean by "stop the war" in gaza, if they mean the current hostilities (which, yeah it's what she probably meant) or end the conflict in its entirety, that could be the biggest God damn ask I've ever heard.

[–] jordanlund 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Particularly since the US is not one of the parties at war.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The US is supplying the vast majority of weapons, paying billions of aid and vetoing any UN resolution against one party of the genocide. Also the US built a landing pier, allegedly for delivering aid. Instead of aid it delivered soldiers who slaughtered some 300 people in a "hostage rescue mission". Also the US provides surveillance flights, shoots down missiles and drones sent to stop the genocider from genociding...

Saying the US is not a party in this, and insinuating that the US has no options to stop this is absurd. The US could stop the weapons flow and stop the diplomatic cover and this genocide would be over within days.

Fucking Ronald Reagan stopped an Israeli onslaught in Lebanon with a single phone call. The US has that power. Biden and Harris choose not to use it every single day. Instead they use their power to make sure enough weapons are there that the slaughter can continue.

[–] jordanlund 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Stopping the weapons won't stop Israeli snipers from killing innocent kids. Bullets are super cheap.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/02/gaza-palestinian-children-killed-idf-israel-war

[–] [email protected] 1 points 40 minutes ago

That is not an argument against not supplying bombs, artillery and tank shells, fighter jets.... And the vast majority of Israeli attacks are not sniper attacks. Also without the US sending missile systems to protect Israel against the neighbors intervening, that gives the cover under which the snipers can act with impunity.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 14 hours ago

All it would take is threatening an arms embargo. Presidents have stopped Israel via a single phone call before, and they need our billions of dollars worth of bombs to continue. Don't act like we're powerless small beans here.

Worst case, they keep going but not on our dime and not with our support.