this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
971 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5380 readers
331 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (53 children)

What problem does blockchain solve?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Apparently, it can be very secure. If “pieces” of a secure key are stored in multiple places, for example, only changing one link in the “chain” means it won’t match with the others. They ALL have to be changed at the same time, which is virtually impossible to do in secret.

Please note that I am far from an expert on the subject. I’m paraphrasing an article I read months ago.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Can’t you takeover a blockchain by owning the majority of a block chain, or by having a majority of the processing power to compute hashes?

[–] KazuyaDarklight 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes which is part of why the major chains are owned and controlled by companies, but then that makes the whole thing pointless. IMO, a company controlled blockchain may as well just be a DB cluster, it would be faster and more efficient.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Are you saying that they “solve” that by never giving up more than 49% stake?

That… seems like a bad solution

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)