Linux

48655 readers

1084 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Was Fedora always so unstable? (self.linux)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by noro_lim_asfaloth to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was on Ubuntu for a year. No major issues, although I used the interim releases, which are supposed to be less solid than LTS. Then, a couple of months ago, I decided to switch to Fedora, just out of curiosity. Many people stated how Fedora is rock solid, Fedora is the new Ubuntu, etc. First some rpmfussion updates broke mesa, then the ostree update broke Flatpak, and recently there was a broken kernel 6.3.11 update that affected some AMD users. A few days ago, I updated my kernel to 6.3.12, and I got frequent freezes on boot. Other users are also reporting such issues. So now I boot with an older kernel. Which is not optimal. There is no LTS kernel on Fedora, the old kernel version doesn't receive security updates. Was it always like that, or it's an unusual bad phase.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you want to continue using Fedora try Kinoite or Silverblue. With their immutability and ease of rollback, I've really enjoyed using Fedora again.

[–] j4k3 1 points 1 year ago

I thought I'd try workstation yesterday with a new machine after being on SB for the last 2 years. Trying to get the nvidia binary turd running was such a disaster, I'm going to try Pop today. I would try SB again, but RHEL paywalled all of the nvidia documentation for RH, and all documentation from Fedora and nvidia is for F37 or older and does not work. I could not get the blob working in the kernel. Maybe there is a way. I'm sure others have managed as I've seen Stable Diffusion telemetry that shows it, but the documentation path to get there is broken. Also the methods needed when following documentation are all the reasons I got on an immutable distro years ago; it is such an impossible mess and dependency nightmare.

I never had an issue with an i7 4k machine, but my new 12k is not doing well either, although my issues are likely bugs in the kernel itself related to laptop firmware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fedora Silverblue is basically my ideal distro. Used it for the past two years on all my machines.

Shame about the telemetry stuff and RHEL bullshit... Jumped to Debian 12 and haven't looked back.