this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
24 points (85.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40676 readers
545 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just start using my homelab to host some new good services, and I want to know what is the approach of a docker setup, what is the best distro for? How to deploy them correctly? Basically I'm a real noob in this subject. Thank you

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ikidd 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When I tried it last (a couple years ago), the docker snap was an untroubleshootable mess. I don't like the idea of running Docker that way, in whatever version of a container that Canonical has come up with for snaps. It's just looking for problems. Run an application with Snap if you want, but a whole container system? No thanks.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just don't use snaps and it works great for me. For docker I add their apt repository and install it like that.

[–] ikidd 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, I wasn't using snaps and it still decided to install Docker snap on me. 2 days of troubleshooting before I figured out that the snap existed and was having a war with my apt install of docker. Never again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I avoid apt because it does silly stuff. Always use apt-get. I suppose having to know that quirk is a con of the distro.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Oh those are not the same?! TIL. Just thought they made it more convenient.

[–] AustralianSimon 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I wrote a script to remove snaps and install Docker as per the docker website. Works great mate.

Plus you get the benefit of frequent updates.

[–] ikidd 2 points 1 month ago

I don't need what Ubuntu offers to run server applications, and Debian is rock solid and predictable. Might as well go to the source since it's Debian all the way down anyway, just with added cruft.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One of their frequent updates completely broke docker on my system. Fortunately they did push the fix by the time I realized what happened.

[–] AustralianSimon 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that because you installed it via snaps instead of apt?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was from docker's apt repo, so a newer version than provided through Ubuntu's channels I assume.

[–] AustralianSimon 1 points 1 month ago

APT install is the same for Debian as it is for Ubuntu. Ubuntu delivers docker through APT or Snap but defaults snap.