this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
177 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59709 readers
5673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I never understood the economics of those Agtech.

The margins on vegetables are shit.

Consumers won't care that each of your potatoes had it's own email addresse, a twitter account and was monitored by an AI.

Farmers are not just redneck assholes who needed some MIT grad to tell them how to increase yield, there's already a huge agro industry and research and we've reached a point where the yield of carrots and others is pretty much already maximised. Assuming they are genius and get a 1% yield improvement that would be enormous.

A farm hand cost $25k a year, and engineer cost $150k and you haven't priced in the tech and the building...

So you basically get a business where the cost of operation is about 20 time higher (and that's conservative) than a guy with a plot of land and a tractor for sensibly the same yield (if not worse) and zero product differentiation in the market.

Well, I guess they just figured out the economics...

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Our climate is changing and we need research like this to ensure that we can still grow food productively in regions where weather is causing crops to fail.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

First, we actually don't really need that research, indoor growing is a very well known activities that is already performed in many places. There are large indoor farms in northern Europe (cold), in the middle east (hot). Greenhouse, tunnels, aren't exactly new.

Second, it's not what those companies were doing, they were trying to create farming factories that are fully automated, their goals was to remove humans, not to find ways to fight climate change.

[–] linearchaos 14 points 3 weeks ago

Oh give us a couple of decades to screw up the environment enough we can't grow outside.

[–] Bristlecone 9 points 3 weeks ago

Perfect example of why worrying about the economic logistics in the face of climate collapse is complete fucking bullshit