this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
549 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

59669 readers
3936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SlamWich 44 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is clownery, humanity is infinite monkeys, and we wrote Hamlet ages ago.

[–] kofe 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are they arguing it wasn't random though? I mean Shakespeare had to think through the plot and everything, not just scribble nonsense on a page

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The thought experiment suggests that over a long enough period of time, every possible combination of letters would be typed out on a keyboard, including Hamlet.

They are not arguing about randomness, as it is inherent to the thought experiment. Randomness is necessary for the experiment to occur.

They are arguing that the universe would be dead before the time criteria is met. It is a bitter and sarcastic conclusion to the thought experiment, and is supposed to be funny.

In conversation, it would be delivered like this:

"You know, over a long enough period of time, monkeys smashing typewriters randomly would eventually produce Hamlet"

"The universe isn't going to last that long."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Nobody asked but I had to share this

It's important to me that everyone understands the joke, even if that understanding robs them of the joy of it. "Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. It kills it".

But it's important because I suffered a lot of being left out as a kid. Others found how good it felt to be exclusive, and shoulder me out of things, or refuse to explain things, or whatever it was that made me the outcast. I could tell from their faces that they love the way it felt when they did that to me. But it hurt me a lot.

I don't want there to be any exclusivity anymore. Nobody deserves that pain. I want everyone to understand the joke, even if that prevents them from ever laughing at it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone keeps forgetting that we're all just what monkeys evolved into...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Actually, both monkeys and us are what our common ancestors evolved into. Which was neither a human nor a monkey.