this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
210 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19125 readers
2883 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

They’re no longer here to offend.

Immigrants, queer people, women, the disabled: all right here to offend, to their faces. But bigots don't care.

I'll accept that bigots in some way care about who they offend when you don't get black bigots who hate black people, woman bigots who hate women, immigrants bigots who hate immigrants, queer bigots who hate queer people, and so on. There are people who talk to the kinds of people they are offensive about and towards every day, and they don't care. "I'm right," they say, "you're just triggered."

[–] habitualTartare 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd make the guess that a lot of family members that would have been offended because they served or at least remember experiencing WW2 are no longer around Ref. It's easier to disregard an opinion of someone as an "outsider", even younger family members. But I'd guess that excluding grandpa/Grandma would be a lot harder when they tell you in vivid detail exactly why they fought what you're voting to have.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm old enough to have met extremely right-wing WWII veterans who voted for racist policies. "It's not fascism because I like it."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There was a status to being a WW2 vet because of the direct experience. Because it was lauded time in American history. And because when you look someone in the eye who has been in a concentration camp, be it the victim or the liberators/witnesses to destruction (gramps wouldn’t give details, it was his job to take his team from camp to camp to liberate, but he implied there was usually little left to liberate.) it’s hard to spout your disconnected nonsense and not get punched in the face.

Now we’re all on equal standing in terms of not a single one of us was there. This is likely how history repeats, this process we’re witnessing right now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

disconnected nonsense

I feel like a major point of modern media is to foster disconnected nonsense.