this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
1039 points (96.3% liked)

News

23296 readers
3321 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 100 Arizona Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, and progressive Democrats and community leaders have signed a letter making the case for those reluctant to support Kamala Harris against Donald Trump.

“We know that many in our communities are resistant to vote for Kamala Harris because of the Biden administration’s complicity in the genocide,” the letter, published Thursday night, reads.

“Some of us have lost many family members in Gaza and Lebanon. We respect those who feel they simply can’t vote for a member of the administration that sent the bombs that may have killed their loved ones,” the letter continued. “As we consider the full situation carefully, however, we conclude that voting for Kamala Harris is the best option for the Palestinian cause and all of our communities.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The best situation for not losing the message would actually be a Harris loss and where various pundits and orgs push the message that it was due to support for genocide

That would maybe work if there were test elections and then the real deal a little after. Having a dicktator for the next 4 years (minimum) is a bit too much to send the message. It is just cutting off your nose to spite your face.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That would maybe work if there were test elections and then the real deal a little after

It also works for real elections. It has precipitated realignments and the downfall and replacement of parties in the US' own history, even. Those had deeper material roots, but then so would the acceptability of supporting genocide.

You are repeating a line that really just disempowers you and those that align with you. It tells you that your role, your "power", is just to support whoever the party picks for you, or else. This is false and self-defeating logic.

Having a dicktator for the next 4 years (minimum) is a bit too much to send the message. It is just cutting off your nose to spite your face.

There was already a Trump presidency. It was from 2017 to 2021. It was not a dictatorship. The country ran basically the same as before, in fact, though he was simply hamfisted in hiw he approached reactionary policies, and naturally this made for great media time and Democrats calling themselves "the resistance". The Biden-Harris administration largely continued his policies, but that "resistance" immediately dissolved, it was just a partisan PR ploy and was not about undoing concrete policy impacts. Biden still threw kids in cages and massively ramped up refugee deportations, attempting to (illegally) prevent refugees from even applying if they crossed the border when undocumented. Biden kept the trade wars. Biden fully coopted and reversed sentiment on racial justice in policing, pivoting Democrats at all levels to be pro-vip and providing large funding increases to racist police squads.

The political class operates far more similarly to one another than they do to you. They just warp perception through partisanship and propaganda. This does not mean they are identical, just it is nowhere near as dramatic as you describe: the class that actually controls this country has no interest in allowing the dictator you are imagining, it isn't going to happen, and the horrific policies you are thinking of will have corresponding ones from Democrats, provided with a smile and an appropriation. Include in that list: genociding Palestine.

[–] Freefall 3 points 2 weeks ago

There was already a Trump presidency. It was from 2017 to 2021. It was not a dictatorship. The country ran basically the same as before,

And there is the GOP talking point. The point that has no relevance to his next term. Imagine claiming nothing has changed from last time....wow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So, you admit that not voting for Dems you vote Trump, but you just think that it's no big deal, because last time he failed to break everything he touched?

Edit: it's a pity there's no travelling to alternative timelines, I'd really love to see what Trump's victory would lead to, but wouldn't want to live in that reality.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, you admit that not voting for Dems you vote Trump

Since I wouldn't vote for Trump, this is obviously not true. But by your logic, since I'm also not voting for GOPers that means I voted for Harris so don't worry.

but you just think that it's no big deal, because last time he failed to break everything he touched?

I see no reason to think Trump was more harmful than Biden-Harris. But at the moment, I'm focused on the normalization of genocide by Democratic voters.

Edit: it's a pity there's no travelling to alternative timelines, I'd really love to see what Trump's victory would lead to, but wouldn't want to live in that reality.

Trump is ahead in many polls. He could win. If he does, how will you feel about selling out Palestinians?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If he does, how will you feel about selling out Palestinians?

I will feel same as now, so don't worry

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago