It's funny when armchair experts insist that the fediverse won't catch on because "federation is too hard to understand" when arguably the most widespread communication system on the internet follows the same model

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Wolfram 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Federation really isn't hard to understand especially when you dive in and start using it. I don't understand anyone who says otherwise.

Somehow this sentiment exists in the selfhosted subreddit and is why the community didn't move to Lemmy. One of the last places I'd expect to let something kinda technical scare them tbh.

[–] Draconic_NEO 5 points 1 month ago

It's an excuse, people don't want to just say they don't want to do it, so they make an excuse not to, saying it's ""complicated"". They don't feel like it or hate it for some irrational reason, possibly a misconception or just hate change.

If you see someone making excuses like this, or even casually making fun of the idea of decentralization and the fediverse, challenge them on it, point out how they are making excuses simply because they don't want to do it, or say no. Ask them how it is "complicated" and make them give an explanation. 90% of the people I've done this with couldn't come up with one and just acted embarrassed after, because they couldn't come up with one. It's a mindless excuse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

"Federation" is like "non-fungible token". Everyone knows what it is, but they've never heard it called that.