this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
325 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39127 readers
2905 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In civilized nations, obeying an unlawful order is, itself, unlawful.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Which honestly might be one of the most underrated democratic safeguards, on top of just helping prevent atrocities towards other people.

[–] PugJesus 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rules-based order > Ruler-based order

I always think, though not in the context of war crimes, how two friends of mine related in Basic Training that the drill instructors would give them strict orders to not let anyone through on guard duty who didn't meet some criteria or another, and then other instructors would come by and attempt to badger and bamboozle the poor trainee soldier into letting them through (and God help any who was stupid enough to let them through).

Rules can be inflexible, but they're also a barrier against arbitrary abuses. Our abuses have to be regular and systemic, dammit!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

"Criteria"? Were clown noses involved?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Not in the US military, and I'm sure others as well. What civilized nations are you referring to? I can only speak to the US, but enlisted soldiers here take a pledge to follow orders, while the officers are actually the ones to take a pledge to uphold the US constitution.

[–] PugJesus 5 points 1 month ago

Not in the US military

Yes, in the US military.

I can only speak to the US, but enlisted soldiers here take a pledge to follow orders,

To follow orders in accordance with the UCMJ.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

US soldiers are not pledging to defend the constitution?!

In Germany for instance every soldiers pledges on the constitution. I thought this was the normal way for countries with a democratic constitution.

[–] MirthfulAlembic 3 points 1 month ago

No, they absolutely do pledge and affirm that. Not sure what that person is talking about. It's definitely, at least on paper, expected for individuals in the military to refuse to follow unlawful orders. What happens in practice is another story. See: entire history of US military action.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah you're wrong though... UCMJ