A vote for Jill Stein, Cornel West, Oliver Chase, or not voting, is a vote for Trump. Palestinian lives don't matter to Trump, nor do they really matter to Harris; however in general, Harris will be better for Americans than Trump, so vote for Harris.
A vote for Jill Stein, Cornel West, Oliver Chase, or not voting, is a vote for Trump.
Just as a vote for Nader was a vote for Bush.
Imagine if Nader didn't run. Imagine there was no Green Party candidate for US President.
Gore would have probably won, and America would have been the better for it. Probably no Iraq war, maybe not even a 911. As a result Iran probably wouldn't be as strong, and Putin probably would have less to legitimately oppose about the US, and would himself be seen as less legitimate—indeed Ukraine might still be whole today.
A new Green deal would probably be in full swing.
Granted, Harris doesn't really care about Palestinians, and some elements of the Democratic party care even less; but Trump cares even less than Harris, and what he will do to the US will be worse.
So while Israel massacres civilians and steals more land, at least under Harris American women would still more easily get abortions, we will have fewer TGs committing suicide (maybe), and health care will be a little more universal.
Also with the 100% tariff on Chinese EVs, the Big 3 will be able to better produce good inexpensive cars (as they've been at least somewhat intending these past several decades), and fascism will have less of a hold on the US.
Therefore: vote for Harris.
If you are a progressive: vote for Harris.
If you are an environmentalist: vote for Harris.
If you are a libertarian: vote for Harris.
If you support voting reforms such as proportional representation, rank balloting, the abolition of the Electoral College, and/or more political diversity: vote for Harris.
If you are nauseated at the idea of voting for Harris: take a barf bag with you while you vote for Harris.
If you are a Palestinian-American who has a relative who was injured, maimed, or even murdered, in Gaza, you should still vote for Harris, because again, Trump doesn't care about them either, but at least you, as an American citizen, will get a better deal Harris than under Trump.
(I'm not entirely sure if I agree with all the above, but I find it hard to refute.)
If you actually want Harris to win, what do you actually think this bullying does to help her?
Just for like a second, consider the person you suppose yourself to be trying to reach, isn't ready to vote for Harris. What do you think this abusive approach to rhetoric does? Do you think it helps Harris?
Israel's current policy is to shoot babies in the head and light them on fire.You've provided no argument for why anyone should vote for Harris, simply an abstract argument that Trump would "be worse". If you really cared about getting Harris elected, you would never dare engage in this kind of obtuse rhetoric that only serves to distance voter Harris herself abandoned even further.
When Harris loses this election, which she is on course to do, the people parroting this idiotic rhetoric will be the ones to blame for her loss. You can't bully or vote shame people into doing what you want them to. It DOES NOT WORK and has significantly impacted Harris' electability among the key constituencies she needs to win. Harris needs Arab and Muslim voters in the upper midwest. Rhetoric like this makes building a bridge to overcome the damage Harris did all the more difficult. Obama literally just used the same rhetorical approach, and it almost assuredly lost Harris a couple points in the south.
If you want Harris to win, you need to do better and focus your criticism on the candidate. No one is owed your vote, and if Harris has policies that are so unpopular she can't get elected with them, focus your rhetoric on fixing the candidate. Otherwise, you are just making the situation worse with this obtuse, play-ground bully approach to electoralism.
If she loses the election, Stein (and to a lesser extent West) will be blamed.
Oh they'll get blamed. The people blaming them will be wrong in their blame of course, but yes, they'll get blamed. I mean shit, look at your post. We haven't even had an election and you are already blaming them.
But if Harris loses this election, its no-ones fault but her own, and those who tried to use abuse as a cudgel.
Like Republicans, Democrats will do pretty well anything to win.
Except ending funding for genocide, of course
but don't Americans, particularly American Christians and Jews, hate Muslims and love Israel?
Is the media giving us a distorted image of USA?
I think that you are right; and that it's almost as if the MSM (including Fox and CNN) are in a sort of collusion with the government, and that advertisers tend to be timid when it comes to non-conservative politics.