this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
89 points (94.9% liked)

Antiwork

7688 readers
114 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Employees know that and plenty of them will leave. They will also find tons of companies that don’t implement archaic policies that only exist to justify real estate investments. Amazon is going to hit a point where the pool of available talent is thin because no one wants to work there, or already has and left because of how toxic it is.

I’ve never heard a single positive comment about being a dev at Amazon. Not one. Every dev I know that has worked there said it was a hellscape.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

They obviously have too many people and are asking them to leave.

If they were without options, they would offer more money or would change work conditions for better. They will not disapear.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's actually still baffling to see companies like AWS and Zoom, who arguably are all about enabling remote work, go with mandates like that. But yeah, it's probably a stealth layoff, except they're going to lose their best employees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

They will lose their most expensive employees who have the most economic security such that they can quit or find other jobs.

Under capitalism, proletarian wage labor is a commodity, this makes its cost minimizable. Tech workers have been spared some of this due to petty bourgeous aspects of their economic relations, part of which was just that they were in short supply and could demand upwardly mobile career paths plus the fact that your direct work really just requires a laptop. Amazon would like its employees to be proletarianized, to be more precarious, to be replaceable, so that they can pay them less and have greater capacity to discipline them. This is also why there was and is a large push for "STEM" education by the FAANGs. Their "labor shortage" arguments are really just a reframing of "we wish we could pay you less and treat you worse by increasing the size of your labor pool".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'll find tons of companies with better work from home policies but which don't pay as well.

And the whole thing about being a dev at Amazon being awful is largely untrue. I live in Seattle. I work in tech. My spouse and friend group work in tech. Some have worked at Amazon or still do.

Amazon largely treats their devs pretty well, but it depends on whether or not you have a good manager, just like any other company.

It's just popular to shit on Amazon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, that’s fair. Amazon is a large company so I’m sure people’s mileage varies. The pay is the sacrifice there. I get paid really well, but not nearly as well as I would at a FAANG. I’m okay with that because I value work/life balance and others things more than the pay, but I completely understand why folks work at those places.