this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
35 points (97.3% liked)

Denver Post Comment Section

313 readers
30 users here now

A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

“Are we having a debate or an interview? … Oh you’re going to fact-check me during the interview? This is adorable.”

Are the cons so stupid as to think that their constant whining about fact-checking is not a signifier (to all normal people, which excludes the magabrained of course) that they just want their LIES to go completely unchecked?

I know to their in-group narratives, "fact checking" is right in line with all the other Faux Cinematic Universe (FCU) bullshit like "OMG, we are soooo censored on Big Tech! I'm being shadow-banned if I don't have millions of followers and it's my RIGHT to spread nonsense on other people's platform and not have it demonetized" and so on...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is almost like she was only ever elected because she’s hot. But that can’t be right!

[–] Speculater 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hot'ish. Like a C-tier aspiring actress who wears the right things, but just, doesn't have "it."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not body-shaming or saying that every woman has to be that mythical "10" or anything (and I'm not either), but I genuinely find her unattractive. Like, her body's fine, but her perpetual sneer and entitled, hateful attitude are such a turn-off. Not that she's offering, but I literally wouldn't fuck with her for any amount of time...

[–] idiomaddict 1 points 1 month ago

I really don’t like the idea of objectifying politicians like this, but, uh, sometimes that expression is part of it.