this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
35 points (97.3% liked)
Denver Post Comment Section
313 readers
30 users here now
A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Are the cons so stupid as to think that their constant whining about fact-checking is not a signifier (to all normal people, which excludes the magabrained of course) that they just want their LIES to go completely unchecked?
I know to their in-group narratives, "fact checking" is right in line with all the other Faux Cinematic Universe (FCU) bullshit like "OMG, we are soooo censored on Big Tech! I'm being shadow-banned if I don't have millions of followers and it's my RIGHT to spread nonsense on other people's platform and not have it demonetized" and so on...
Is almost like she was only ever elected because she’s hot. But that can’t be right!
Hot'ish. Like a C-tier aspiring actress who wears the right things, but just, doesn't have "it."
I'm not body-shaming or saying that every woman has to be that mythical "10" or anything (and I'm not either), but I genuinely find her unattractive. Like, her body's fine, but her perpetual sneer and entitled, hateful attitude are such a turn-off. Not that she's offering, but I literally wouldn't fuck with her for any amount of time...
I really don’t like the idea of objectifying politicians like this, but, uh, sometimes that expression is part of it.