Science Memes

11189 readers

2647 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

944

Artifical Intelligence (mander.xyz)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Many unedited or using old Ai images I can detect with one look. A few more I can find by looking for inconsistencies like hands or illogical items.

However I am sure there will be more AI generated images that may even be a little bit edited afterwards that I can't detect.

You will need an ai to detect them. Since at least in images ai is detectable by the way they create the files.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In AI-generated sound you can see it in the waveform, it has less random noise altogether and it seems like a huge, well, wave. I wonder if sth similar is true for images.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Basically yes, lack of detail, especially small things like hair or fingers. The texture/definition in AI images is usually less. Though, once again, depends on the technique being used.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I heard they managed to put some noise into ai generated audio, so it's even more difficult to tell it