this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
244 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

58126 readers
4274 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan1101 98 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (28 children)

As expected, they can't be trusted. And the more AI evolves, the less likely AI content will be detectable IMO.

[–] jocanib 12 points 1 year ago (27 children)

It will almost always be detectable if you just read what is written. Especially for academic work. It doesn't know what a citation is, only what one looks like and where they appear. It can't summarise a paper accurately. It's easy to force laughably bad output by just asking the right sort of question.

The simplest approach for setting homework is to give them the LLM output and get them to check it for errors and omissions. LLMs can't critique their own work and students probably learn more from chasing down errors than filling a blank sheet of paper for the sake of it.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (11 children)

given how much AI has advanced in the past year alone, saying it will "always" be easy to spot is extremely short sighted.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People seem to grasp onto weaknesses AI has now and say that they will have them forever, like how text AI lies, and image generation AI can't draw hands.

But these AIs are advancing unimaginably quick, 2 years ago generated text was pretty bad, becoming pretty incoherent, and 1 year ago generated images were mostly strange mush.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Spot on! Actually people still talk about hands but it's already been solved with many newer image gen models... The hands they produce look perfectly fine usually these days.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)