this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
793 points (97.8% liked)

RPGMemes

10314 readers
497 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
793
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they'd have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (19 children)

I'm not looking for assumptions, I'm looking for RAW. I don't know about you but at my table we play by the rules.

[–] TheMarchioness 3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I think the bigger problem here is that you're arguing in bad-faith.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Bad faith? The only faith I have is in the rules as they are written, like a gospel!

[–] TheMarchioness 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's why when she gave you four arguments that should clear the matter up, you cherry-picked one of them and said that it was "making an assumption" and therefore invalid, even though the "assumption" was that the player understood language. That's why you ignored the other three arguments entirely.

You're deliberately trolling for attention. and this faux-innocence isn't fooling anyone.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't ignored anything intentionally, if I haven't addressed a supposed claim to why this isn't RAW it's because it was added in an edit after I replied.

(psssst, read the first line of the OP)

[–] TheMarchioness 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The first line of the OP does tacitly say that you're arguing in bad-faith, yes.

[–] papalonian 1 points 1 month ago

This reads like someone in the comments of an Onion article mad that someone would spread false information.

It's a joke, g. Throw some dice and make up some bullshit RAW of your own, it's fun.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree. People are getting all riled up for no good reason.

I think you're hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

OP: this is purposefully obtuse Other people: engages with OP OP: is purposefully obtuse Other people: shockedpickachu.png

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)