this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
795 points (97.8% liked)

RPGMemes

10353 readers
389 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
795
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they'd have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 months ago (56 children)

A disintegrated creature and everything it is wearing and carrying, except magic items, are reduced to a pile of fine gray dust. The creature can be restored to life only by means of a true resurrection or a wish spell.

Why would you need to be "restored to life" if you weren't dead?

[–] [email protected] 91 points 2 months ago (52 children)

Because you could later die. So a creature that has been disintegrated, and then later dies, can only be brought back by those means.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (21 children)

You're misreading the language. It is present-tense, not future.

[–] Alinor 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm sorry, I don't know enough about the English language to recognise the difference. What would the phrase be in future tense?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

No. He's trolling you. No Reasonable person thinks this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

If the creature dies it can be restored to life only by means of...

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments (51 replies)