this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
635 points (84.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

29321 readers
385 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But the contention is about music being better, and that's some bad music.

[–] Graphy 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Did we read the same post?

Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it

I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive.

Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.

[–] Plastic_Ramses 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, and Jack White aint pretty either.

Imo, this post is better directed at hollywood

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Jack White

He looks good enough to me.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your comment makes sense in the frame of "ugly people are allowed to make music," my comment refers to the "music was better" part of the post.

The ugly people you mentioned don't support your comment's argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not "better."

Some music sucked in the boomer's days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.

[–] IAmNotACat 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what the comment you replied to starts with.

[–] IAmNotACat 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah so what’s your problem with what he said then?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?