this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
209 points (97.7% liked)

Ukraine

8099 readers
397 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4899357-speaker-johnson-ukraine-zelensky/

Zelensky visited the factory flanked by Pennsylvania Democrats, including Gov. Josh Shapiro (D). It is common for governors to appear at such events in their state. Johnson and Comer, however, said appearing with a political figure who was briefly a contender to serve as Harris's running mate made the stop political in nature.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 83 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Dear Mr. Speaker,

Demonstrate as much opposition to Russian money and influence in your politics, and I will happily consider your request.

Sincerely,

Volodymyr"

[–] perviouslyiner 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

"we refer you to the answer given in Arkell vs. Pressdram"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://proftomcrick.com/2014/04/29/arkell-v-pressdram-1971/

Dear Sir,

We act for Mr Arkell who is Retail Credit Manager of Granada TV Rental Ltd. His attention has been drawn to an article appearing in the issues of Private Eye dated 9th April 1971 on page 4. The statements made about Mr Arkell are entirely untrue and clearly highly defamatory. We are therefore instructed to require from you immediately your proposals for dealing with the matter.

Mr Arkell’s first concern is that there should be a full retraction at the earliest possible date in Private Eye and he will also want his costs paid. His attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of your reply.

Yours etc.

~Reply:~

Dear Sirs,

We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr J. Arkell.

We note that Mr Arkell’s attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you could inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off.

Yours etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago
[–] Badeendje 7 points 2 days ago