Linux

48352 readers

575 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Linux middle ground? (self.linux)

submitted 2 months ago by Bunny19 to c/[email protected]

146 comments fedilink hide all child comments

so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Arch is easy to maintain and is stable enough. Of course you can make Arch unstable if you do greedy stuff, but if you use like a normal person, it will be fine

It's using Arch for 5 years now and I never broke my system, for example

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Arch lacks consistency as they are constantly pushing the latest versions of everything. If you want that then that is fine but calling is stable is not really arcuate. They entire system is changing and updates are pushed weekly. You also can't setup automatic updates safely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I called it "stable enough". For a home user, it's stable enough. It's a myth that Arch will break every update or it is unstable. Arch is as unstable or stable as you make it be.

You also can't setup automatic updates safely

That's partially true. If you're trying to run a server, yeah, don't set any automatic update. If you're home user, you may do it and you'll be fine, but be aware of your system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is updated almost everyday. That doesn't seem very stable as it is constantly changing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Well, it is. Is so stable that many of Arch users install Arch once and don't have to format the computer again in years.

Of course you can't say that Arch is as stable as Debian, cause it's not. But it's totally unfair compare these distros, cause the use cases are completely different.

Don't use a ruler to measure how loud a sound is.