Political Weirdos

That's fair (since we're both already getting downvoted. lol), I'll totally admit I had no idea that's what you were trying to communicate

To me, it seemed super dismissive of what they were actually trying to communicate and have a discussion about since you only addressed the source and ignored the rest.

Just went back, and yep the rest of the conversation, thanks to you, is entirely about the source. Was that helpful, to you? Do you think it was more helpful to you than to them? Did anyone else reading it change their mind? Just seems like pointless bickering instead of constructive dialogue (I'll admit I am assuming this is something we all want)