Technology

60179 readers

4354 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

841

ISPs tell Supreme Court they don’t want to disconnect users accused of piracy (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago by ForgottenFlux to c/technology

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Four more large Internet service providers told the US Supreme Court this week that ISPs shouldn't be forced to aggressively police copyright infringement on broadband networks.

While the ISPs worry about financial liability from lawsuits filed by major record labels and other copyright holders, they also argue that mass terminations of Internet users accused of piracy "would harm innocent people by depriving households, schools, hospitals, and businesses of Internet access." The legal question presented by the case "is exceptionally important to the future of the Internet," they wrote in a brief filed with the Supreme Court on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Everyone is different.

I personally think copyright and patent laws need to die. If you can't protect your own secrets, don't rely on taxpayer resources to do it for you.

White-collar workers were cool with machines and poorer nations taking blue-collar jobs. Now that it threatens them and their money, the hypocrisy is on full display.

[–] General_Effort 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

White-collar workers were cool with machines and poorer nations taking blue-collar jobs. Now that it threatens them and their money, the hypocrisy is on full display.

Heh. Yes. It's even beyond hypocrisy. Many will outright say that automation is supposed to churn over these "dirty, boring" jobs while making their own lives better. Even finding themselves on the receiving end of progress, they don't call for a better social safety net. No, they just want to get rent for their property. I wonder how much copyright industry has to do with the steady move to the economic right, through its huge influence on culture.

[–] Maggoty 2 points 3 months ago

Well yeah, but the displaced workers should get a share of the profits. Most proponents of automation are also proponents of a UBI. It's not supposed to be an existential threat.

[–] dirthawker0 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Americans would not want the price of produce to get higher but a) it relies on employing undocumented labor and b) it's very hard to find American citizens these days willing to do that kind of hard physical work.

[–] Maggoty 3 points 3 months ago

No it isn't. It's very hard to find Americans willing and to work hours past a normal shift with little to no protective gear in a workplace that makes OSHA look like a bedtime fable.

Put workers in shifts, give them gear, and stop asking ridiculously dangerous stuff, and you'll find plenty of Americans willing to work the job. The Meat Packing industry is the perfect example of this because they were hiring Americans. Then they decided immigrants were cheaper and they raised the price. This idea of them passing the savings along is literally marketing material. They aren't dripping prices unless the market forces them to do so.

It was always the boss versus the workers.