It is backed by the Ukrainian and German governments in particular, with the Ukrainian branch of UN Women playing a key role. Participants in the alliance include the foreign ministries or development agencies of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Estonia, the United Kingdom and the United States, as well as the EU.

Finnish media outlets have previously reported that issues related to sexual and gender minorities do not progress under Tavio's watch, and that he does not allow any mention of sexual or gender minorities in his speeches.

Sounds like the usual regressive far right bullshit to me, only with an obviously even more transparent excuse this time.

[+] Streetlights -6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean I'm not doubting the minister is a bit of a homophobe but I don't think it's wrong to focus aid on the disabled.

[–] Warl0k3 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's more about, in this case, how he's openly sexist since that's what this alliance seems to be against. But either way that's a classic false binary. There's no reason they cant provide aid for both groups at the same time, it doesn't take away from either group to do that. This wasn't even much additional funding, it was a policy oversight thing who's stated goal decidedly wasn't "care more about women than disabled people".

[–] Streetlights -5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's true I suppose. His motivation does not appear to be altruistic but if it was a case of diverting limited funds, I can see his excuse not to fund this being reasonable.

[–] Warl0k3 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Oh good, so you agree that his excuse is unreasonable then! I'm glad we had this little discussion.

[–] Streetlights 4 points 3 months ago

Yes, thank you for the polite discourse.

[–] partial_accumen 1 points 3 months ago

I can see his excuse not to fund this being reasonable.

"When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time." -MayaAngelou

I believe you.