this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
531 points (96.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21580 readers
994 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 106 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    It's really more like Remote Desktop+. It has some additional "features" (slight retch) on top of traditional Remote Desktop features.

    Let's wait and see if it's actually more secure than traditional Remote Desktop.

    (and I'd still rather use Wine)

    [–] rtxn 50 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Did they invent X11 Forwarding over the network?

    [–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

    [–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    waypipe exists, but it's still not perfect.

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

    Never heard about this. Thx.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

    Neither was X11 so it's in good company

    [–] db2 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Btw. when we get wayland ~~forwarding over Network~~?

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

    /c/foundthenvidiauser

    [–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Unlike X11, Wayland was never intended to be network transparent. As others say, solutions like waypipe and more tradionally RDP and VNC exist.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Exactly. We won’t. We’ll get specialized video stream over network. I’m not happy about this regression. I understand that was a willing sacrifice to achieve better local performance, but I’m not sure it was worth it.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Their reasoning was that X11 network transparency had been broken for quite some time. If you tried running chrome, most games, or anything with modern hardware acceleration over X11 forwarding, they wouldn't work.

    So, IMHO waypipe is actually an improvement in terms of compatibility, rather than a regression.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

    You always had the option to send frames over the net using VNC and such. But for many use cases, X over SSH was absolutely fantastic.

    I remember using it on a very basic DSL connection to work remotely back in 2005, and it was almost like running local. You don’t get anywhere near the same performance with VNC or RDP.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    It’s more about security if I recall correctly

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    How so? Is there a way for malicious code to start injecting itself into calls to 127.0.0.1?

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    Sorry, I am not an expert myself, but I think there are some recourses about that in the internet

    Or, this file on x.org:

    “But the X protocol is still unsecure by design…”

    https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2014/XDC2014DodierPeresSecurity/xorg-talk.pdf

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

    Yeah, to send it naked over the wire would be nuts, which is why everybody uses SSH. But unless there’s insecurity within the computer, that’s a moot point.

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    X11 can render individual windows (Xclients) through the network on another Xserver since decades. With XPRA you can even buffer them, to move them from one Xserver to another or make sure they survive network disconnect. It's very cool, but not widely used.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Yes, the ssh -X flag forwards it.

    [–] rtxn 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

    I doubt it's nearly as secure as OpenSSH though.

    [–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

    it goes through an SSH tunnel

    [–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Bottles and boxes are basically the Windows app.

    [–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

    No, it's just remote. Remote desktop is now also called Windows, also the operating system you are connecting to is called Windows.

    Gnome has relatively good rdp support, so with this you could use Windows (the app) on Windows (the os) to connect to you Linux machine running Gnome.

    It seems deliberately confusing naming is working as expected, Microsoft marketing team should get extra raise.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Microsoft strategy 101. My “favourite” is the database called “SQL Server”

    [–] pchela 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Doesn't everyone call it MS SQL anyway?

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

    No they call it Sequel Server