this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycling

2243 readers
14 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was always wondering this. Imagine a steep descent. What is better for brake wear - braking constantly or more powerful just at the end? Anybody knows? Goes for both rim and disc brakes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Physics says both use the same amount, just one is spread out more and the other is all at once. I don't have the formula, but basically it takes the same overall effort to stop an object regardless of if it's slowly or very fast.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

If you however travel at greater speeds, you loose more energy to air resistance since it squares with velocity. If you only brake at the end you will have lost a greater amount of energy to air resistance and less energy will go into the brakes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I get the thinking (because it's my first thought too), but the basic force formula (F=M*V^2), means velocity is the greatest influence on Force.

So braking from the higher speed will result in a greater force, meaning more energy dissipation.

I think. Maybe there's something I'm missing here, like including the time to convert that energy to heat via the brakes. Perhaps in the end it's all the same (braking early and keeping speed down), since we're always converting the energy imparted by gravity to heat.