Laws targeting specific firearms and ammunition

"1994 Federal assault weapons ban, United States. This law banned the sales and ownership of semiautomatic firearms and large-capacity ammunition magazines. Koper and Roth (76) using UCR data (1980–1995) found no association between the law and homicide rates in 15 states after adjusting for the presence of other firearm laws and crime laws in New York and California. A recent study by Gius (48) showed that the federal assault weapons ban was associated with higher rates of firearm homicides."

But scary black gun is bad right?

"Saturday night specials, United States. Saturday night specials are inexpensive poor quality guns commonly used in crime activity."

There was no association between these laws and homicide rates, according to two of three studies while the third showed it to be effective in Maryland when comparing to 2 neighboring states. Which two? Maryland is bordered by 4 states. Why were those two chosen as controls and not the others?

Interestingly, one study showed a decrease in overall suicide rates but not in firearm suicide rates.

"The 1988 Victoria state law, Australia. Ozanne-Smith et al. (78) examined the Victoria law that tightened restrictions on semiautomatic long-arms and pump action guns, by comparing pre versus post trends of annual death rates in Victoria compared with other states in Australia. The law was associated with a 17.3% decrease in the rate of firearm deaths and lower rates of firearm suicides, but not with firearm homicides (78)."

This is the one we were talking about before. It worked in Australia! ...Well, if you're only counting accidental deaths and firearm suicides, or whatever isn't included in that 17.3% decrease that wasn't homicide.

"Laws targeting sentences and punishment for gun offenders Deutsch and Alt (79) examined the 1975 Bartley-Fox amendment to Massachusetts’ gun control law that mandated a 1-year minimum prison term for carrying firearms without a license and a 2-year sentence for crimes committed while in possession of a firearm. Examining the following 6 months post implementation, these authors found no association between the law and homicide rates. 2 other studies found similar results.

One study did find a large (55.7%, damn lol) decrease in the rate of homicides when using different controls. Duetsch later showed that there were in fact fewer homicides when studying a longer timeline.

It does appear that these and similar laws work pretty well. I'd imagine because those committing the crimes that got arrested were no longer able to commit said crimes from prison, though I admit that's speculation.

I thought this Detroit thing was interesting:

"the 1986 Detroit law (mandatory jail sentence for unlawfully carrying a firearm in public) was associated with *higher rates of firearm indoor and nonfirearm homicides but not with firearm homicides or those committed outside."

On the whole for this section, it showed mixed results. Lots of studies say they have no effect, lots say there were some reductions.

Laws promoting voluntary rendition of firearms.

"Rosenfeld (93) found no association between firearm buyback programs implemented in St. Louis, Missouri (1991 and 1994) and firearm homicides. More recently, Phillips et al. (94) found that yearly firearm buyback programs implemented in Buffalo, New York, from 2007 to 2012 were not associated with reductions in firearm homicides."

This part made me laugh out loud:

**Leigh and Neill (95) evaluated the 1997 Australian gun buyback program and found no association between the program and firearm homicides but a reduction in suicide rates associated with the number of firearms that were bought back."

I am happy about reduced suicide rates.

Simultaneous implementation of laws targeting multiple elements of regulations

US Gun Control Act of 1968.:

Magaddino and Medoff (96), using data for the period 1947–1977 in structural models adjusted by state characteristics, found that the law was not associated with changes in homicide rates.

District of Columbia 1976 law:

"This law banned residents from owning automatic and semiautomatic firearms and handguns, placed stronger requirements for home firearm storage, and required registration of all firearms"

One study finds an abrupt reduction in homicide and suicide rates with no similar changes in controls, while another study disputed those controls and found no abrupt or gradual changes in the homicide rates.

1996 Maryland Gun Violence Act.:

"Stronger regulations including background checks and registration of handguns sold by private gun owners, 1 handgun purchase per month, and greater authority given to police and judges to confiscate firearms from domestic violence offenders."

"The law was associated with reductions (from 10.3% to 11.4%) in firearm homicide rates in Maryland, assuming an immediate or delayed start, and constant/gradual effects"

A legitimate win, it seems. Fuck yeah!

Canadian firearm-related bills:

The effectiveness of these laws is debatable. Studies showed conflicting data all around.

They did seem to reduce accidental death rates.

**The 1996 National Firearms Agreement (NFA) and the South Australia Firearms Act.:

"This regulation required a license for firearm purchases; new owners were required to pass an examination on the handling and safety of weapons. The law also included increments in the severity of penalties for firearm offenders and registration of all firearms"

This law seems to work well, especially when compared to the buyback. Lower rates in homicides, suicides, accidental deaths, and mass shootings. Hell yeah. This has been a good law for Australia.

The Estatuto do Desarmamento in Brazil.:

"This law tightened restrictions on the possession of firearms and ammunition, implemented requirements for the registration of owned firearms, increased firearm costs, and established stronger penalties for illegal trafficking of firearms"

"... using time-series models (1996-2004) found that observed deaths were lower than predicted ones in the next 6 postlaw months."

But... What kinds of deaths? And, why only over 6 months? Also, how's Brazil looking today?

The 1997 Austrian firearm law. :

"This law placed restrictions for some firearms (including handguns and semiautomatics) and mandated background checks, minimum age requirements for purchases, safer firearm storage regulations, and waiting periods"

4.8% reduction in firearm homicide and 9.9% reduction in firearm suicide.

This one seems to work, using some of the things that worked from the above sections.

The New Zealand Amendment to the Arms Act:

"Bans on certain firearms, licensing for dealers and firearm owners that required passing training tests, police assessments of applicant and applicant’s home, and interviews with family members."

Seems overly invasive and only reduced firearm suicides, but not all suicides, and homicide wasn't mentioned.

Conclusions

"In a comprehensive review of firearm-control legislation worldwide, we identified a range of studies examining the association between firearm-related laws and firearm deaths. Three general observations emerge from this analysis:

1. The simultaneous implementation of laws targeting multi- ple elements of firearms regulations reduced firearm-related deaths in certain countries;
2. some specific restrictions on purchase, access, and use of firearms are associated with re- ductions in firearm deaths;
3. challenges in ecological design and the execution of studies limit the confidence in study findings and the conclusions that can be derived from them."