Political Memes

5619 readers

2347 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

1636

Say the line (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by Hugin to c/politicalmemes

154 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Anything regarding storage is essentially unenforceable until after a tragedy has occurred.

One could require a receipt or proof of purchase for a safe or a lock when buying a gun.

It also implies that everyone's situation at home allows them 1) to purchase two safes and 2) to have room for two safes and 3) limits their ownership of either guns or ammo to the size of that safe.

That's intentional.

It also doesn't make much sense to have two safes if the person doing the shooting is the one that is buying the ammo and guns in the first place.

We need comprehensive laws grounded in addressing specific issues

I was specifically addressing teenagers access to their parents guns, specifically to prevent school shootings.

As for operating under a license, what would that do beyond the existing restrictions for procuring firearms? Do they expire and what would happen then?

Like a car license. You may not be checked all the time, but every once in a while and it's a crime to not have it if you're driving.

[–] brygphilomena 1 points 3 months ago

One could require a receipt or proof of purchase for a safe or a lock when buying a gun.

That's why in CA they make you buy a lock. But I don't really know anyone that uses the one they had to buy.

That's intentional.

This means only rich or well to do people can own guns?

I was specifically addressing teenagers access to their parents guns, specifically to prevent school shootings.

I'm okay with storage laws in homes that are primary residences to minors. But I don't believe that any storage law on its own prevents it. There is no way to ensure it's being following once the gun is taken home. It's why I am much more in favor of trying to influence gun culture to make improper storage stigmatizing.

Like a car license. You may not be checked all the time, but every once in a while and it's a crime to not have it if you're driving.

Those with concealed carry licenses do get checked as they are to tell an officer when they are carrying. I wouldn't be against these laws being federal. As for just ownership, do you just check everyone if they have a license or only when the police see the gun? Or when they go shooting on public BLM land?

The analogy for driving breaks down because you can buy a car without a license. You just can't drive it on public roads. Though you can on private roads without a license.