this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
68 points (95.9% liked)
Shows and TV
378 readers
53 users here now
Open discussion of Media / Shows / Television
- Be nice
- Don't go off topic
- Don't rage farm
Other communities
We are still open to mod application, please comment on this post: https://lemm.ee/post/40675177
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's probably the main critic among fans. It's okay to have this kind of characters, just don't call her Galadriel
I think there is a hollywood trap right now, investors want safe returns, so big franchise names have been thought to be the safest return you can invest in.
A creative wants to make a story they can call their own.
Rock meets Hard Place, so the creatives - in order to get funding to create - co-opt existing franchises in their pitch, and if it gets accepted, they want to tear down the previous lore so they can make it their own.
So we end up in a loop where franchisees often get abused in the new creative works.
Like the Joker movie gamespot
Damn, talk about lazily arrogant writers. They must know they're going to piss off the fanbase, "I've got a new take on Tolkien that's BETTER than Tolkien!" and this is what happens when the corporate suits who greenlight this sort of misguided "hot politically correct take" don't care ANYTHING about Middle Earth, all they see are mirages of $$$ and the fidgety anxiety of budgets and deadlines.
For a hot minute there, I thought this current generation of writers and directors who were given this new format of high-budget 8-12 episode series, were going to make the best use of this golden opportunity.
Instead we get crap like Goyer inserting his brain farts and artificialities all over "Foundation" until the spirit of Isaac Asimov is no longer felt on the screen, at all.
Could you please edit your message to be less aggressive? The first rule of this community is "be nice"