this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
401 points (94.9% liked)

World News

38553 readers
3204 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

So call a second election. The people will solve the impasse. Either a majority emerges or eventually the parties, exhausted by campaigning, will learn to compromise and make a coalition. Democracy will find a way.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 28 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

will learn to compromise and make a coalition

Lol. You're new to French politics?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

French Unity is when deGaulle has you dragged out back and shot for disagreeing.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 9 points 3 weeks ago

Only in the colonies, so that was allowed!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

How are your trash cans looking? Are any of them on fire yet? Y'all really know how to protest

[–] AnUnusualRelic 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I expect that as a random US person, coming onto a native, you have at least spent some university time on European political systems to have some arguments?

  1. the constitution doesn't allow for another election
  2. there's actually never been such a situation in this constitution (yes, our constitutions are just laws, not gods given sacred scrolls, so we change them whenever they're no longer adequate), and the current politicians cannot fathom working without a majority (although that was typical in the third and fourth republic, and in a lot of the other euro countries)
  3. the president wants a so called "technical" government that will just do as it's told while the chambers fight among themselves

And yes, it's a shitshow. Shall we go back to how you're about to elect an insane game show host along with a guy that's had half his brain eaten by a worm?

[–] Snowclone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump has no hope next to Harris, Biden stepping down has been the smartest move I've seen from Democrats since runnng Obama, people are energized, no one wants the other confused old guy.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's what many people hope for. But then it's the US, so anything goes.

[–] Triasha 2 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair to us, the brain worm guy dropped out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Could you explain please why another election is not allowed in France? I though Macron dissolved the parliament early for a new election, which brought us to this situation in the first place.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 4 points 3 weeks ago

The constitution says that you can only do it once a year. Which makes sense as you have to deal with the stupid decisions you make.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Shall we go back to how you’re about to elect an insane game show host

Hey now. There's slightly over a 50% chance we get the coconut lady, instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As a Greek I have some familiarity. Our politics is just as adversarial (if not more) and there is no tradition of coalitions. But when push came to shove, they figured it out, if only for a bit.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While Greece was arguably mismanaged, it didn't deserve the harshness it got. But the same political mess could well be in the future of France.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Rekhyt 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The parties aren't the problem. Macron holds the presidency and appoints the PM. The largest (coalition) party is giving him a candidate AFTER compromises and he's refusing STILL because he only wants a PM from his own party, who came in second (edit: not third, my bad, they did beat National Rally. They did come in third in the first round of voting though).

[–] AnUnusualRelic 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Macron holds the presidency and appoints the PM.

The big debate is on whether he "appoints" the PM or "picks" the PM.

The constitution doesn't exactly specify which, and usage was that he would appoint the one issued from the majority vote (but there's no majority, there's just one group that's a wee bit larger). So he's having his fun, pretending to have a chat with everybody, while knowing all the time that they can really all fuck off and the he'll do as he pleases.

In the end he'll most likely have what they call a "technical" government made of non political ministers that will just do as they're told, because the chambers will be too busy infighting to do anything about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It sounds like the candidate PM would not have the confidence of the Assembly though because the center doesn't want to play ball with the left and the left doesn't have a majority.

That's why I'm suggesting elections. Keep going until either a majority is elected (in which case I assume the president is obligated to appoint its leader) or the parliamentary math changes.

If Macron and the center are serious about keeping the cordon sanitaire against the far right, they should obviously play ball with the left. The fact that they are not tells me that they are not serious. The left should be able to make that argument to the electorate and hope to convince a majority.

Edit: not only is Macron showing lack of seriousness in keeping the far right at bay, he is also undermining the legitimacy of the presidency by playing parliamentary shenanigans and triggering such a constitutional crisis. I never really understood the fundamentals of France's semi-presidential system, but in a parliamentary republic like Germany, or Ireland, or Greece for example, the president does not get to play politics with the parliament's confidence like this. I don't understand why the French think this is a good system.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Why the fuck are centrists and right wingers always holding hands to prevent any kind of leftist power?

Oh right, money

[–] cley_faye 8 points 3 weeks ago

the parties, exhausted by campaigning, will learn to compromise and make a coalition

Good luck with that.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not possible, there's a one year delay.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

God damn it, De Gaulle really screwed you guys over, eh?

[–] AnUnusualRelic 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You can't repeatedly dissolve the chamber. I don't think that's a bad thing.

The real problem isn't with the constitution. It's with the fact that the French are no longer able to create coalitions around a project. The whole political system is built around the idea that one group has a majority and does as it pleases until the next election. Talking to others is completely alien to them. And that is a real problem.

Most of the other European countries work with coalitions. It makes much more sense (I understand that this is alien to US people).

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 3 points 3 weeks ago

Most of the other European countries work with coalitions. It makes much more sense

Eh. Post WW2 European "coalitions" are largely just iterations of the modern Democratic Party subdivided by region and cultural touchstone. There isn't a huge ideological gap between German Christian Democrats, Christian Socialists, Free Democrats, and Greens, for instance. The real divide is between East and West, and that's where you get a rump AfD that grew out of the corpse of GDR Communists.

Similarly, Macron's En Marche party is itself this coalition of French business interests that are terrified of Melanchon and conservative nationalists who don't sit well with LePen's National Front. He's synthesized a position between his old boss Hollande's champagne socialism and Sarkozy's moderate business friendly white nationalism. But now all the half measures have dried up his base of support.

Spain's government is similarly bifricated along lines that go back to the civil war of the 1930s. Italy's is a hogpodge of parties that are still strictly aligned with the industrial north or rural south. You can repeat this pattern across the entire continent. Yeah, a multi-party system exists, but the coalitions are ultimately all defined by their relationships to international business. Are you the finance friendly international markets party or are you the angry proletarian outsiders?

The social policies of the parties might vary based on whether the base is liberally cosmopolitan or conservatively rural. But the root of the divide always comes down to questions of profit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

As a Dutch voter (who voted left) I’m happy with the coalition in the Netherlands if compared to a theoretical where the far-right party PVV rules alone shudder

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

But then he risks losing again.