He ‘s sufficiently geeky to speak the language, to invest in things beyond the next quarter and be willing to take a risk in things not yet proven to be profitable. Those are good things for a ceo.
Maybe I give him too much credit (like I used to with Trump), but in the beginnings I assumed he was forced into twitter after running his mouth off into what could be securities fraud if he didn’t follow through. . And he’s so lost. So badly lost
Meanwhile Tesla needs attention and direction but losing its focus on cars is not the way. He really should have spawned off another company so the robotics stuff could sink or swim without impacting his successes
He ‘s sufficiently geeky to speak the language, to invest in things beyond the next quarter and be willing to take a risk in things not yet proven to be profitable. Those are good things for a ceo.
Maybe I give him too much credit (like I used to with Trump), but in the beginnings I assumed he was forced into twitter after running his mouth off into what could be securities fraud if he didn’t follow through. . And he’s so lost. So badly lost
Meanwhile Tesla needs attention and direction but losing its focus on cars is not the way. He really should have spawned off another company so the robotics stuff could sink or swim without impacting his successes
"CEO is smart because he tried to look for profit in multiple quarters at the same time" would make a great headline at Forbes