this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
523 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59675 readers
3555 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 112 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

If there are any French or Germans in particular reading this please share on your numerous native instances: If you are in the EU you need to contact policy makers (as outlined in the article) about this. I'm sorry I can't be with you on this one but Brexit.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The beauty of high level corruption is that local peasants can't do much about it.

Good news is that Germany for example if trying to get away from corpos and use OSS, so at least we know within german government there are people who [see] this issue properly.

[–] CosmoNova 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately your information seems a little outdated. It’s true that Germany did try it for a moment until Microsoft showed up with suitcases of money in the chancellor office so to speak and he announced to essentially move away from open source again.

Though on the federal level, there‘s still some hope. Maybe.

[–] shrugs 4 points 3 months ago

You are talking about Limux which started 2 decades ago, but there are other initiatives to enforce oss software in german government.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)