this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
1522 points (98.6% liked)

People Twitter

5155 readers
1852 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sam_Bass 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The having fewer billionaires is always left out and always the reason none of the other stuff seems to matter

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why would renewable energy necessarily mean fewer billionaires? Major solar/wind generation plants have to be built by someone and somewhere, it seems like the best you're doing is making billionaires pivot their investments/changing which people the billionaires are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's called ✨nationalised/socialised utilities✨.

Imagine not being able to even, well, imagine, a world where profit isn't the one and only motive for human behaviour.. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Why does moving to renewables necessarily mean nationalized/socialized utilities? Imagine not being able to imagine a world where one thing you support is not inexorably tied to every other thing you support.

[–] Sam_Bass 1 points 2 months ago