this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
298 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

60003 readers
3122 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 112 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

US9421713B2 - Additive manufacturing method for printing three-dimensional parts with purge towers

US9592660B2 - Heated build platform and system for three-dimensional printing methods

US7555357B2 - Method for building three-dimensional objects with extrusion-based layered deposition systems

US9168698B2 - Three-dimensional printer with force detection

US10556381B2 - Three-dimensional printer with force detection

That's like all of 3d printing, that's pretty scary. If they win on all 5, seems like it'd kill consumer 3d printing entirely.

[–] Schmeckinger 59 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When I look at these patents all of them seem to be patenting others inventions from years ago. So I hope prior art wins.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Which would also strip them of each of those patents.

[–] FinalRemix 16 points 4 months ago

Stop! I can only get so erect.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why can they even patent stuff they didn't invent?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 4 months ago

Better lawyers. Patent law is so f'd up. Few understand it and those that do take advantage of it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I read the heated bed patent and it was about the way it's built, so I'm not convinced it's a general hot bed patent but something more small detail about how they are using it.

I suspect someone will need to do more research and this article is a knee jerk reaction

[–] Thunderbird4 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eastern District of Texas is extremely favorable to patent trolls. It’s not a coincidence that they filed the suit there.

[–] Hexbatch 2 points 4 months ago

I hope one day it will be illegal to shop for judges to shut down tech companies

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

That seems geared only towards FDM printers, so SLA (resin) is still ok-ish? I do suppose those really big powder printers could also suffer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So when do we have fun with the ip owners in moonbase alpha?