this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
771 points (96.3% liked)

World News

38571 readers
3138 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veneroso 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Umm is the person in the correct weight class for this event? Yes. Okay next!

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For the "men's" event, yes. Weight is the only restriction. Women should be able to fight in the men's event if they qualify.

For the women's classification there must be a clear line drawn somewhere between "has given birth" and "changed their name to Sue".

(I have no preference exactly where that line is drawn)

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The youngest Olympian this year is a 12-year-old from China competing as a skateboarder. The youngest ever was an 11-year-old who competed in gymnastics.

Should we be letting those young girls know whether or not they count as girls through some sort of unspecified genetic test?

Why do you think women need to be protected by having to prove they're women? Do you really not get that tons of women would be discouraged from competing if they felt they had to satisfy some white knight's genetic criteria?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Should we be letting those young girls know whether or not they count as girls through some sort of unspecified genetic test?

If there is no gender advantage there is no need.

Do you want to go further and say for skateboarding and gymnastics there should be no segregation?

Women do need segregation, for saftey more than anything. There needs to be a clear line otherwise these arguments will continue to occur.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If there is no gender advantage there is no need.

So there's no need?

Do you want to go further and say for skateboarding and gymnastics there should be no segregation?

So there is a need?

Women do need segregation, for saftey more than anything.

Women do not need your protection, nor have they asked for it.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course woman need the protection of their sporting governing bodies. That's their job.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You think women need protection and men don't. That's the issue here. You're being a white knight.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Governing bodies also provide safety regulations for men.

[–] FlyingSquid -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And yet you have never once mentioned how men need this same sort of protection. In fact, you've made it very clear that women need your protection.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've not talked about horses or dogs either.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 month ago

And now I am almost certain you're trolling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Women do need segregation, for saftey more than anything.

What convinced you of this?