Science Memes

10940 readers

1790 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

871

Noise (mander.xyz)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BreadOven 140 points 3 months ago (1 children)

[–] someguy3 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It only said it licks feet. Gotcha.

[–] NatakuNox 16 points 3 months ago

Still going to do the splits

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

ah but how can you prove that the implication wasn't that it'd lick anything that touches it? you can't extrapolate exclusivity from only one data point, it's more sensible to assume slutty grass

[–] someguy3 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It doesn't say "it licked my feet" which would be one data point. It says "what if it licked your feet", that is asserting that one condition and no others. You can't extrapolate anything else.