this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
109 points (93.6% liked)
Ukraine
8310 readers
615 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam
- No content against Finnish law
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How else does American companies profit off war if there is no war to be fought?
hey, maybe you got america all wrong, huh. alternate question: how does it benefit american companies profits, if russia starts hurling nukes across the pacific and over the artic circle?
The existence of nukes didn't stop the government from participating in proxy wars during the Cold War period, and they certainly didn't stop them from directly invading other countries in the early 2000s.
If I had to hazard a guess, nuclear annihilation isn't the greatest concern.
If they had the balls to start hurling nukes when they were threatened (and they damn well are threatened) the world would be over long ago
Which is to say, suggesting that they are ever going to be able to punish something as big as the US is fear mongering that only benefits russia
one hot nuke launch at the us or it's territories, allies, or nato partners, and the entire world goes up. just one. doesn't even have to be that punishing. just one single solitary launch. one tiny nuke baby. uno. une. sule.