this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
1251 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59327 readers
6977 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I still don't understand how the Californian government bailed them out when they were bankrupt, yet they were allowed to remain an independent company? Why didn't the government take full control?

Electricity in cities in the Bay Area that have their own municipal power company (like Palo Alto and Santa Clara) is literally 1/3 the cost of PG&E.

[–] jaybone 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

FUUUUUUUUUUUCK PG&E

Fuck them. If there was ever a case to be made for government owned utilities (and like why is that even a debate in the first place?) these assholes would be the poster child.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Palo Alto's got the right idea - the city runs the electricity, gas, water, sewer, and they also have a city-owned fiber internet provider for businesses (which they want to eventually roll out for residential use too). Services are cheaper than other cities where they contract these out to third-party companies, since they're running them to benefit residents, not to make money.

They do contract out some things (garbage/recycling/compost is contracted to GreenWaste) but not many.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because the USA haven't had the balls to hold corporations responsible for their actions in decades. They can save them from failure, but have no willpower to correct any of their malevolent behaviors.

I really hope this generation is the one that finally changes that trend.

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Gotta keep the rich people rich so they can fund my campaign.

It’s not about the balls to hold them responsible, it’s about not biting the hand that feeds you. They don’t want to do anything about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Because the governor owns a looot of shares. It’s just basic blatant corruption.