this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
390 points (98.5% liked)

Liberty Hub

231 readers
82 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

transcript [text overlaid on several pictures of benches and outside windowsills. the benches have bars, or gaps to prevent someone from sleeping on them.

text reads "Ban anti-homeless arctithecture"]

sauce: https://mastodon.social/@AnarchistArt/112901196516297447

Hostile architecture is among the symptoms of the hostile modern city, where neighbours never say hi, and people die on the streets as people walk passivly by.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kbobabob 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

problems they can't control

Well, now that's an assumption.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh you're right, they must be deciding to be homeless. Why didn't i think of that?

[–] Kbobabob 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I've literally talked to some homeless people that chose to not participate in society...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So better to just leave them exposed to the elements than change society to not leave them disenfranchised? A choice to not participate in society shouldn't equate to a choice to live without the most basic degree of safety and stability.

That's a "choice" just like someone who can't afford life saving medicine "choses" to not receive treatment. Its society's failure, not the victim's.

[–] Kbobabob 0 points 3 months ago

Where did I even insinuate that kind of a statement?

[–] count_dongulus 0 points 3 months ago

I know three homeless people personally. Am related to one. Two are meth users, the other is on heroin. The one I am related to has stolen money and random stuff he could pawn from anyone in my family who let him stay at their house, so he became homeless cause nobody could trust him and he often wouldn't show up for whatever local job he got. (He has a truck and we gave him gas money until we learned he wasn't actually going to work.) Couldn't stay at shelters either because of drugs. Lived in a trailer in the woods for a bit with his girlfriend until she kicked him out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

And I fully understand that, have you seen society lately?

Sometimes it is tempting to just say fuck it all

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Hey cool they're being apolitical. Centrists must love them