this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
136 points (95.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43786 readers
994 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not getting it. Creepy how?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Creepy in the sense that keeping the room intact was a monument to pain, and handling that pain in an incredibly unhealthy way. It’s just too sad.

If they just moved on and cleaned the room out, it would be fine. I’m not talking about ghosts or any crap like that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You know, I don't really see the harm. How is this not just a scaled up version of keeping pictures?

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There’s a difference between some photos and keeping an entire grungy room as a shrine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And besides scale, what is it?

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don’t be stubborn. I think you can intellectually understand there’s a big difference between the two.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

In this specific case, it actually seems fine to me. Like the other poster said, what are they supposed to do, turn their dead son's room into a home theater? I'm sure that won't put a damper on movie night. /s

As it is, it serves as a much more immersive version of a photograph. I don't see the harm.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not, but if a sudden change in acceptability happens do to a continuous change in scale, I feel very comfortable asking why.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It’s an awkward situation for sure. I’m trying to imagine what could be done with the room if they cleaned it out. All I can think is that they could never convert it into a room that they would want to spend time in, and the only alternative seems to be storage which almost seems disrespectful to the memory.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah. I mostly just thought this was a sweet memorial. It doesn't necessarily mean they're in denial or anything, they just want to keep a piece of him there like most grieving people do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah okay, thanks for the extra context

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Glad to help! It could be read as the setup for a cheesy horror story.